Catherine Pugh, Esq.
1 min readApr 17, 2021

--

I suggested you try critical reasoning. You went with hubris masking thinly as candor, as it often is. Unfortunate.

Had you used your mind more and mouth less, you'd appreciate that only a layperson promotes one exclusive on-line only source over another. I am not a layperson. You think one is something. I know both are nothing, and thus equally matched. Worse, a court would take testimony over Snopes's "I can't negate but found no evidence" take.

That is my world and, thus, my standard. If Snopes rules your world, so be it. But I won't adopt your hierarchy b/c you can't rise to where I operate — big kids don't play in a child's sandbox, kiddo.

You'd probably be good people, except you think having teeth makes you special. It doesn't - it makes you mouthy and stupid. I've lived that life, with mouth open and ears closed. The other way around better serves. You'll be decent when you learn that.

I'll leave you to your sand and your pounding. Take care. We won't be speaking again.

--

--

Catherine Pugh, Esq.
Catherine Pugh, Esq.

Written by Catherine Pugh, Esq.

Private Counsel. Former DOJ-CRT, Special Litigation Section, Public Defender; Adjunct Professor (law & undergrad). Developed Race & Law course.

No responses yet